LIFE
We convince ourselves that life will be
better after we get married, have a baby, then another. Then we are frustrated
that the kids aren't old enough and we'll be more content when they are.
After that we're frustrated that we have teenagers to deal with. We will
certainly be happy
when they are out of that stage.
We tell ourselves that our life will be
complete when our spouse gets his or her act together, when we get a nicer
car, are able to go on a nice vacation, when we retire. The truth is,
there's no better time to be happy than
right now. If not now, when? Your life will always be filled with challenges.
It's best to admit this to yourself and decide to be happy anyway.
One of my favorite quotes comes from
Alfred D. Souza. He said, "For a long time
it had seemed to me that life was about to begin - real life. But there
was always some obstacle in the way, something to be gotten through first,
some unfinished business, time still
to be served, a debt to be paid. THEN
life would begin! At last it dawned on me that these obstacles were my
life".
This perspective has helped me to see that
there is no way to happiness. Happiness is the way. So, reassure every
moment that you have. And treasure it more because you shared it with someone
special, special enough to spend your time... and remember that time waits
for no one... So stop waiting until you finish school, until you go back
to school, until you lose ten pounds, until you gain ten pounds, until
you have kids, until your kids leave the house, until you start work, until
you retire, until you get married, until you get divorced, until Friday
night, until Sunday morning, until you get a new car or home, until your
car or home is paid off, until spring, until summer, until fall, until
winter, until you are off welfare, until the first or fifteenth, until
your song comes on, until you've had a drink, until you've sobered up,
until you die, until you are born again to decide that there is no better
time than right now to be happy...
Happiness is a journey, not a destination!!!
|
|

|

We are very excited to be
moving into a brand new facility the first or second week of June 2008.
The new facility is located at 14810 N. Florida Ave., just a block and a half
south of Bearss Ave. on the west side of the road in the Mobley Homes building.
One side of the new facility will be devoted to personal fitness, the other to
our massage therapy services. We will be adding new services with our new
fitness area, and we are very pleased to have the services of LeShan Barrios who
will be developing our Yoga program. We will be starting the first Yoga
class in our current facility, Thursdays at 6:30 a.m., and are reserving space
now. LeShan is a very experienced instructor, and is the owner of Ananda
Yoga of Tampa. LeShan is also available for private Yoga sessions.
You may visit her
website for more
information and pricing.
Stay tuned to our "News &
Events" page for additional fitness services to be added. We will be
adding pictures soon to aid you in locating the new facility. We will also
be holding an Open House with special events, if you would like to be added to
our e-mail list, please e-mail us at:
webmaster@timelesshealingarts.com, your e-mail
privacy is a high priority and will ONLY be used for THA informational purpose

In this area, we
will frequently offer articles of interest, written either by T.H.A. staff
or by published authors of health related articles. We hope you find
the articles interesting and informative.
Contents:
Touch
Deprivation: The Stigma of Touch
Sciatica
is it a Pinched Nerve?
Women's
Brains More Vulnerable to Alcoholism
'Middle
Age Spread' can raise heart attack risk
China
Trip
Touch
Research Abstracts Vol. 5 No. 2 Spring 1998
Touch
Deprivation: The Stigma of Touch
At least 30 percent
of girls and 10 percent of boys are sexually molested before they are 18.
Unfortunately, the high incidence of sexual abuse has been a great deterrent
for healthy sexual development. Parents and teachers are afraid of touching
children because their physical affection might be misinterpreted. Thus,
children are deprived of touch at a very early age. That is also the reason
that many day care centers no longer employ male teachers. The stigma of
touch leads to touch deprivation.
In the words
of Ashley Montagu, "Such alarm is understandable in a society that has
so confounded love, sex, affection, and touch. The genuinely loving parents
have nothing to fear from their demonstrative acts of affection for the
children or anyone else". The problem with gross misinterpretation of affection
towards children is that it has made parents and teachers paranoid about
hugging and touching the children, and the children have had to tolerate
significantly less affection.
A director of
a model preschool in Massachusetts addressed the problem of potential lawsuits
from teachers touching preschool children in a recent National Public Radio
interview. A caller
asked her what her teachers would do if a child was hurt on the playground
and came running to one of them. She said rather dispassionately that her
teachers would be advised not to touch or hold the child.
A multi-faceted
observation study was recently conducted at the Touch Research Institute
Nursery School. The study included: 1) the different types of touching
the children received from their teachers and from the other children;
2) where on the body the touch occurred, and 3) whether the touch seemed
to be for communication purposes or for affection. We found that despite
our being a model nursery school, the teachers touched the children very
little, particularly as they grew older. We then showed the data to the
teachers who said they touched very little because they were concerned
about their touching being misconstrued as sex abuse. After a discussion
on acceptable types and places for touch the teachers increased their touching
(and particularly affectionate touching).
The stigma of
touch extends to adolescents and adults, as is suggested by a study at
Swarthmore College where students were told that they were going to be
taken to a darkened room of people and then to a lighted room of people.
In the dark room more than 90% of the student strangers touched each other,
and almost 50% of them hugged each other, while almost none of the subjects
in the lighted room did so. Subjects were too shy to touch when they could
be seen, but more willing to touch in the anonymous dark. In another experiment
students confined to a completely dark room for one week experienced a
marked increase in touch sensitivity as well as sensitivity to pain.
We recently conducted
a massage therapy study to introduce touch on a psychiatric unit for adolescent
psychiatric patients. In most psychiatric units across the world there
is a "no touch" policy. Staff are concerned about the potential sexual
abuse accusations and promiscuity between the kids. After being massaged
for one-half hour a day for a week the children were less depressed, less
anxious and their stress hormones (cortisol and norepinephrine) decreased.
They also showed more organized sleep patterns and more appropriate behavior
after massage therapy. Despite these significant changes and the earlier
discharge and hospital cost savings, the program was never adopted. When
the staff were asked what happened, they expressed two concerns. The sex
of the therapist was one concern. If the therapist was of the opposite
sex, some sexual acting out might occur.
If the therapist
was the same sex, the children/adolescents might become homophobic. Although
the data showed no incidence of either problem, we switched to using volunteer
grandparents as massage therapists. The second concern expressed by the
staff was that the patients talked more during massage therapy than psychotherapy.
Thus, the psychiatrists wanted us to tape record the sessions. Our solution
was to simply tell the children and adolescents that massages are better
without talking (and they usually are). The program continued after
these adjustments were made.
In the 1960's
American adolescents and adults made a special effort to overcome the stigma
against touching by joining sensitivity training, encounter and marathon
groups. This human potential movement (which occurred primarily in
places like Esalen and Berkeley, California) was oriented towards touch.
Touch activities included back rubs, massage, hands-on relaxation exercises,
trust exercises (one person falls back into the arms of the other), love
baths (everyone in the group hugs one another), and blind walks (one person
leads the blindfolded partner on a walking journey teaching that person
tactile discrimination). The movement inspired lots of
literature on touch
including Jane Howard's Please Touch and a novel by Glenn Davis called
Touching. Several investigators including Dr. Prescott have
suggested that touch deprivation in childhood leads to physical violence.
Prescott has reported that most juvenile delinquents and criminals come
from neglectful or abusive parents. He believes that "the deprivation of
body touch, contact and movement are the basic causes of a number of emotional
disturbances including depressive and autistic behaviors, hyperactivity,
sexual aberration, drug abuse, violence and aggression. His theory is that
the lack of sensory stimulation in childhood leads to addiction to sensory
stimulation in adulthood resulting in delinquency, drug use and crime.
This theory derived from a study conducted in 49 primitive cultures (from
the Ainu to the Zuni). These cultures were notably similar except that
in those where children received very little physical affection high rates
of adult violence were noted, and no adult violence occurred in those cultures
with high levels of physical affection towards children. These findings
could of course relate to third variables like parental sexual abuse, although
cultural differences on this and other negative effect variables were not
found.
Touch deprivation
is also harmful to children because it severely affects sleep. Sleep is
necessary not only as a stimulus barrier but also for conservation of energy.
Touch deprivation caused by periods of separation from parents invariably
leads to sleep disturbances in children. Heinicke and Westheimer studied
2 year-old children who were separated from their parents for 2 to 20 weeks
and were living in an institution where they received less touch. Even
after they were reunited with their parents, most of the children had difficulty
falling asleep or remaining asleep. In all our studies on separations of
very young children from their mothers, whether the children were separated
for the mothers' hospitalization for the birth of another child or mothers'
out-of-town conference trips, sleep was always affected. The time the children
required to fall asleep was longer, and
nightwakings were more
frequent. Although the children sometimes continued their "normal classroom
behavior," sleep (both naptime and nighttime sleep) was typically the most
affected of all the behaviors observed.
Suppressed Immune Response
Touch
deprivation also affects the immune system. Steve Suomi has conducted a
number of immune studies with monkeys testing the relationship between
physical contact and the body's ability to respond to an immunological
challenge (a tetanus shot). They found a direct relationship between the
amount of contact and the amount of grooming an infant received in the
first 6 or 7 months of life and its ability to produce antibody titre in
response to an antibody challenge at a little over a year of age.
A suppressed
immune response has been noted in several studies following separation
of monkeys from their mothers. This includes less antibody production in
response to an initial injection of an antigen and less natural killer
cell activity. One way that touch might influence the immune system is
by lowering arousal levels and their accompanying stress hormones. Stress
hormones are known to dampen the immune system. Social grooming among pigtail
monkeys, for example, is associated with a decrease in heart rate and stress
hormones. In turn, immune function improves. Immune function also improves
in humans receiving deep pressure touch.
Compromised immune
function can also result from sleep disturbances which, as we discussed
before, can be caused by touch deprivation. Dr. Martin Reite and his colleagues
at the University of Colorado Medical Center found that after a 2-week
separation from their mothers, infant bonnet monkeys experienced both sleep
disturbances and a suppressed immune system. After reunion with their mothers
their immune function returned to normal. The monkeys who were separated
from their mothers showed depressed behavior including huddling in corners
and changes in body temperature, heart rate, brain waves, and sleep patterns.
Even after being reunited with their mothers, some of these symptoms persisted.
In our studies
on touch deprivation among preschool children who were separated from their
mothers, we noted more frequent illnesses, particularly upper respiratory
infections, diarrhea and constipation. In a study on younger infants (10
weeks old) the opposite effects were noted when the mothers provided extra
tactile stimulation. The mothers were taught to massage their infants'
backs, and the infants experienced fewer colds and less diarrhea approximately
4 months later.
The skin secretes
an immune hormone that is very similar to the hormone from the thymus gland
that produces T cells. T cells are a significant part of the immune system
because they destroy antigens. T cells are important for patients who have
cancer or similar diseases. Ironically, both the immune system and the
skin immune hormones are compromised because these diseases tend to decrease
the desire for sex (even though people with cancer may desire more physical
closeness) and thus the skin hormone is not secreted. At a time when
their immune system is severely compromised, their immune problem seems
to be compounded by their lack of interest in sexual intimacy. Other forms
of intimacy including holding, back rubbing, and comforting touch.
|

Sciatica-Is
It a Pinched Nerve?
By Dr. Robert Kidd-Taken
from the RHEMA Newsletter May 1997 issue-
Sciatica
is a word we use to describe a pain running down the back of the leg. It
is usually thought to come from the sciatic nerve, which develops from
several little nerve roots branching off the spine. When one or more of
these nerve roots are "pinched" by a herniated disc, Sciatica develops,
or at least so we have been lead to believe.
But is this the
whole story? Not always, because Sciatica is not always what it seems to
be. In fact, often no nerve is pinched at all, but rather pain is referred
down the leg from painful structures in the back. Referred pain is
different from the pain of a pinched nerve. Referred pain is harder to
understand because it does not follow the pathways of any nerve and is
often felt in locations quite removed from its origin. An example that
many people know about is referred pain from the heart --pain which is
often felt in the left arm. No nerve runs from the heart to the elbow,
but somehow the brain perceives pain coming from the elbow as well as (or
instead of) the heart. This may be a mistake on the brain's part, but it
probably doesn't matter much, because the purpose of the pain is really
to make the patient lie down and rest for a while until the heart heals.
Sciatica due
to referred pain is similar to pain from a pinched nerve, but at the same
time is different in some respects. This distinction is important because
treatment of the two conditions may be quite different.
Sciatica from
a pinched nerve tends to go down the back of the leg to the foot. It may
be felt as a band right down the back of the leg, or it may be felt in
only part of the back of the leg -- the calf, for example. Often pain or
numbness is felt in part of the foot or the toes as well. Coughing will
often provoke a shot of pain into the back of the leg, and sometimes there
is weakness in the leg or ankle.
Sciatica from
referred pain may go down the back, front or side of the leg. When it goes
down the back, it will skip the back of the knee. This is one of the most
important ways to tell the difference between Sciatica caused by a pinched
nerve and Sciatica caused by referred pain. Sometimes there is pain or
numbness in the foot, but it tends to be more vague than that from a pinched
nerve.
X-rays are not
much help in separating these two types of Sciatica. CT scans and MRIs
may be useful, but are far from fool-proof. They sometimes show us more
than we really want to know. In fact, 30
percent of pain- free people will have bulging or herniated discs if we
look for them, yet are experiencing no pain problems whatsoever. So for
someone with Sciatica, a bulging disc on the CT scan is no guarantee that
the disc is the cause of the pain.
What it boils
down to is that there is no replacement for a careful examination to separate
these two types of Sciatica.
THA comments:
A nerve may also be entrapped by muscle, which we find to be a common producer
of "sciatica" pain. This is common in other locations of the body
also. Therefore, in our opinion, a "pinch" or impingement by a bulging
or herniated disc is the least common cause of this pain. In the
overwhelming majority of patient presentations for "sciatica" pain, complete
relief is achieved by competent neuromuscular treatment combined with proper
stretching and strengthening techniques, both in clinic as well as by the
patient at home.
*****************************************************************************
Women's
Brains More Vulnerable to Alcoholism
By Amy Norton-NEW YORK, Feb 08 (Reuters Health) -
Women's
brains may be particularly vulnerable to the damage caused by alcoholism,
new research findings suggest. The study is the first to show distinct
gender differences in the brain "shrinkage" that strikes alcoholics.
Lead author Dr. Daniel
W. Hommer told Reuters Health that the study adds to work showing that
women may be more prone to liver and heart damage from alcohol abuse. "We're
showing that the brain is basically the same as these organs," he said.
Hommer and his
colleagues at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism in
Bethesda, Maryland, report their findings in the February issue of the
American Journal of Psychiatry.
In the study,
the investigators obtained brain scans of 79 male and female alcoholics
after 3 weeks of sobriety. They then compared the brain volumes with those
of 39 healthy study participants. The researchers found that while male
alcoholics showed signs of brain "shrinkage" compared with healthy men,
the difference between alcoholic and healthy women was even greater. The
shrinkage probably reflects the killing off of brain cells, according to
Hommer.
On average, alcoholic
women showed an 11% smaller brain volume than healthy women. Such a difference
would be unlikely to make a significant dent in mental capacity, Hommer
noted. None of the study participants, who had an average age of 40, showed
signs of mental deficits.
However, Hommer pointed
out, brain shrinkage increases with age in all people. The early decreases
seen in alcoholics may make them more vulnerable to cognitive decline and
dementia as they grow older, he explained.
"Alcoholism is
linked to dementia," Hommer said. And this study, he noted, suggests that
alcoholic women may be particularly at risk.
Besides these age-related
effects, alcohol-related brain damage may hinder a person's ability to
kick the habit, although more research in that area is needed, according
to Hommer.
Exactly why heavy
drinking would have more profound effects on women is unclear. But, Hommer
noted, the same amount of alcohol sends women's blood alcohol levels higher
than it does men's, which could explain the different effects on the brain.
As far as how
heavy drinking affects non-alcoholics' brains, very little is known, Hommer
stated. The patients in this study had averaged about 12 drinks per day.
What three, four or five drinks a day might do is unclear, he added.
Source: American Journal
of Psychiatry 2001;158:198-204.
'Middle
Age Spread' can raise heart attack risk
SAN
ANTONIO, Mar 05 (Reuters Health) - There is no such thing as a little
harmless potbelly in a middle-aged man, scientists reported Friday. Their
studies showed that any and all abdominal fat increases the risk of heart
disease.
Results of a study
of 1,346 Finnish men aged 42 to 60 suggest that waist-to-hip ratio is even
more important than obesity alone in terms of increasing risk of heart
disease. At the American Heart Association's 41st Annual Conference on
Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Dr. Timo A. Lakka of
the University of Kuopio, Finland, said that "abdominal fat is metabolically
more active than other fat. We know it increases free fatty acid transport
to the liver." That action can increase cholesterol, he said.
Dr. Ronald
M. Krauss, chair of the American Heart Association's council on nutrition,
physical activity and metabolism, said that abdominal fat can also affect
blood sugar metabolism and may promote diabetes--itself a risk factor for
heart disease.
Just a single
measurement--waist circumference--can also be a useful predictor for heart
attack risk, the Finnish researcher said. Krauss said the American Heart
Association suggests that a 40-inch waist in a man and 35 inches in a woman
is a marker for obesity and may be associated with increased risk of heart
attack.
"But any weight
gain around the middle should be avoided and there should be an attempt
to lose that weight," Krauss said. "Losing even a few pounds can reduce
the risk for heart attack."

Please
submit all questions and comments to: TimelessHealingArts
|